I versus Algorithms 2 – Who moved my home page?
I woke up interrupted on a Saturday morning with my wife
furious at our sons.
The friction is not in the algorithms that decode, predict or recommend, but what they are deployed for.
“You are not getting my phone, again.”
Both the sons claimed innocence
while shifting blame at each other; in the crossfire my desire to get
additional sleep got a quiet burial.
My wife was looking for some
breakfast ideas on Youtube and found her home page filled with Cartoon videos
playlist, as long as she could scroll down.
“This isn’t how it was a month
back; I had my cookery, comedy and news playlist. I gave the phone to them for
cartoon drawing tutorials, and here is what I get.”
Greater surprise awaited my
wife, when she moved to check her Google Updates list and that also had
majority items on new releases from the cartoon studios to fun facts, fan sites
et al.
“Blame it on algorithms, not
them” I tried to reason with a smile.
The cat and mouse game of
algorithms
Let’s look at the world of
algorithms with a rather simple abstraction – the cat and mouse.
The mouse doesn’t live to be
cat’s food; neither is eating mouse, the only purpose of cat’s life.
However, their lives are
interconnected with survival as intersection point.
The cat tries to get smarter
at catching, and so does the mouse in eluding in their own cognitive ways.
To go few levels deeper into
their world, the cat doesn’t randomly hunt its prey; it maps the possible
sites, paths to the sites including where the chances of finding mice is
higher, and if it can throw in some inducements.
The mouse goes about its own
life finding food, it’s shelter and a consciousness against potential traps, or
chance encounter with cats.
Similarly, our increasingly
digital lives have footprints; no matter how random or, unique they are
connected with objectives – to be informed, entertained, undertake commerce,
interact or, ideate.
These footprints act as
breadcrumbs that drive algorithms developed by companies, platform players with
almost the same objectives. These are the intersection points.
As the footprints increase,
algorithms get trained better, get smarter.
The recommender algorithms in
Youtube with the initial data of cartoon making tutorials, figured out that the
user loves cartoons and loaded some initial lists of favorite characters. My
sons started with the many facets of cartoon making and later changed track to
watching the many unseen videos of their favorite characters.
The intersection point changed
to a full area of overlap, until that Saturday morning!
The evolution
It has been almost 25 years
since we dived into a more networked world.
From music playlists, news,
commerce to even social networks there is a list that’s unique to us. The order
of news that I get and you get is different, even to the extent of facts and
opinions around the same news.
This customization of epic
scale is not just design of algorithms but carry objectives of their
developers, organizations with goals from economic, scientific, social to the
political.
As network and user base grows
in scale and complexity, algorithms increasingly supplement human
decision-making, to a point of replacing human decision making.
It is as good as how
automobiles and aeroplanes supplemented and augmented human travel, or electron
microscopes allowed us to penetrate beyond capability of human eye to improve
understanding at molecular level to the tools that we require for accelerated
vaccine research.
The growth of algorithms is
perhaps not just an outcome of computing power and massive data, but what
Galileo in 16th century had insisted that mathematics is the
language in which God has written the universe.
Scientists over the centuries
from Aryabhata, Newton, Copernicus to Einstein made pathbreaking advancement in
developing human knowledge without computing resources with mathematics, and
influences from science and philosophy.
Hence, algorithms are the
evolution of centuries of human quest to understand the universe by building
mathematical structures to our physical world and behaviours.
The data deluge and algo
troubles
An estimated 294 billion mails,
65 billion Whatsapp messages, 5 billion searches 500 million tweets and
petabytes of data are created across Facebook to major platforms and social
networks, everyday.
4.6 billion people accounting
for 60% of world’s population use the internet, with objectives.
As governments step up digital
connectivity and surveillance, companies digitize more and 3.8 billion users on
social media intersect, there is friction at play.
The friction is not in the algorithms that decode, predict or recommend, but what they are deployed for.
To increase its sales if a
company follows your digital footprint through apps and websites to plant its
irritable ads without permission, then it has no respect for your privacy.
As some governments have developed
surveillance to restrict specific freedom or drive a narrative, have also led
to creation of moderating algos that muffle free speech.
Now, let’s look at our own “Top
picks for you”, “From your past orders”, “For you” and “Today’s
stories” lists across apps and sites. What do they tell about our choices,
about us?
Shallow, impulsive, hurried,
deal-hungry, attention-seeking or, nuanced, rigorous, curious, exploratory and creative?
Time to
reset purpose
When we look at the jaw
dropping developments in basic sciences over the course of human history, a lot
was achieved with spirit of enquiry and with elementary tools, from the
standpoint of what we have today.
There is a serious need to
re-ignite, recognize and reward such quest, such progress.
There is a case to use more
filters, deny app permission and discard random feeds so that we create space
on internet that helps us with our objectives.
As we work to grow our
intelligence as a society with integrity, respect for rights, champion new
knowledge and make this accessible, these virtues will flow into our algorithms.
How do your recommendation
lists look?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
May also read - I versus Algorithms
http://bluepeepal.blogspot.com/2019/02/i-versus-algorithms.html
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
May also read - I versus Algorithms
http://bluepeepal.blogspot.com/2019/02/i-versus-algorithms.html
References:
Very good read. Ethical AI is evolving as an important subject. It's not enforceable though. Therefore, human beings need to stay intelligent to outsmart the smart devices.
ReplyDeleteThanks Pravash. Enforceability will be evolutionary in the form of consent-based access, privacy laws and significant step up in user responsibility and awareness.
DeleteInteresting read!! Liked the way you have linked it back to your Feb 2019 Blog.
ReplyDeleteAs a matter of fact we are all surrounded by algorithms in our digital lives and unknowingly they influence how we operate and what content we thrive on!!
Thanks Ameya.
DeleteBest information articles this website
Deletepeepal tree
Very good and interesting write up. I like your optimist attitude on data ethics and teaching itself, I am a cynic thete
ReplyDeleteThank you Leena for reading and your take on the matter.
DeleteAwesome Read!
ReplyDeleteNice read!
ReplyDeleteVery good read Anand.. was able to connect and it made sense...I agree with lot of what you have mentioned!
ReplyDelete